• Further New Features Are Available - Click To Update
  • Join OxVox

    The forum would encourage all members to consider joining OxVox during this important moment in our history. See here for more information.

Transfer Window 26/27 Summer Embargo Window



 
Last edited by a moderator:
This guy has been very vocal as ITK on the Mills rumours. Was saying earlier it was a done deal, etc and an announcement would be imminent. And now it's a case of Mills would have to force a move. Funny how it's gone from him having completed a medical yesterday, to not having agreed a fee with us yet. Time will tell, but it seems to be unravelling a bit
1785961757013.webp
 
This guy has been very vocal as ITK on the Mills rumours. Was saying earlier it was a done deal, etc and an announcement would be imminent. And now it's a case of Mills would have to force a move
View attachment 36855
No good agreeing personal terms with the player if Preston don’t meet the asking price
 
Last edited:
This guy has been very vocal as ITK on the Mills rumours. Was saying earlier it was a done deal, etc and an announcement would be imminent. And now it's a case of Mills would have to force a move
View attachment 36855
How can he have agreed terms if we haven't accepted an offer for him? They can't speak to him until we do, can they?
 
This guy has been very vocal as ITK on the Mills rumours. Was saying earlier it was a done deal, etc and an announcement would be imminent. And now it's a case of Mills would have to force a move. Funny how it's gone from him having completed a medical yesterday, to not having agreed a fee with us yet. Time will tell, but it seems to be unravelling a bit
View attachment 36855
Quite obvious he's chatting out his a**e
 
Quite obvious he's chatting out his a**e
Regardless, he's managed to help convince many fans that Mills was a done deal when it appears that it's far from that. A fee hasn't been agreed with clubs, and they were talking about him having a medical yesterday... We will get a better idea on Saturday with the lineup, or potentially with training photos before then
 
How can he have agreed terms if we haven't accepted an offer for him? They can't speak to him until we do, can they?
Yes they can if oxford give written permission
But then this person says player power needed
If we have given permission for mills to speak then we have basically said yes to a transfer as long as Preston can meet what we want so there is no need for player power
 
Yes they can if oxford give written permission
But then this person says player power needed
If we have given permission for mills to speak then we have basically said yes to a transfer as long as Preston can meet what we want so there is no need for player power
Yep, they've referenced Whiteman's departure, so they're suggesting it would need to be a similar case with Mills refusing to play to force a move. As it stands, the only people who've spoken on this move have been Preston ITK and Nixon, who've both said very different things. Can't say he's completed a medical and announcement imminent if the clubs haven't even agreed a fee...
 
How can he have agreed terms if we haven't accepted an offer for him? They can't speak to him until we do, can they?

Couldn’t they agree a deal in principle with his agent? Agent then relays info to Mills.

Surely the rules can’t stop the players agent speaking to a potential new club?

I just assumed that was the way around it?

So yes officially no terms agreed, but the player at least knows the likely terms if the current club accepts a bid.
 
So has someone summarised old and new rules
OLD RULES CHAMPIONSHIP LAST SEASON
Could overspend £105M over rolling three years
NEW RULES 85% of revenue ? And budgets rules ?

EFL1.
New rules 65% of revenue / invested money for a relegated club. Plus proof of financing for the season ahead by 30 June ?

Is this about right ?

So a bit of saving Stan Mills wage bill won’t solve the transfer embargo.
 
Couldn’t they agree a deal in principle with his agent? Agent then relays info to Mills.

Surely the rules can’t stop the players agent speaking to a potential new club?

I just assumed that was the way around it?

So yes officially no terms agreed, but the player at least knows the likely terms if the current club accepts a bid.
Isn't that what they used to call 'tapping up'?
 
So has someone summarised old and new rules
OLD RULES CHAMPIONSHIP LAST SEASON
Could overspend £105M over rolling three years
NEW RULES 85% of revenue ? And budgets rules ?

EFL1.
New rules 65% of revenue / invested money for a relegated club. Plus proof of financing for the season ahead by 30 June ?

Is this about right ?

So a bit of saving Stan Mills wage bill won’t solve the transfer embargo.
The transfer fee and wages come off the 65% of turnover so if the transfer fee was £3m and its paid now and not spread over 3 years and mills was on £10k a week
The total off the 65% would be £3.5m
(if no sell on clause)
 
The transfer fee and wages come off the 65% of turnover so if the transfer fee was £3m and its paid now and not spread over 3 years and mills was on £10k a week
The total off the 65% would be £3.5m
(if no sell on clause)
But still won’t solve proof of funding by 1 July 2026?

So cutting wage bill now achieves nothing if we can still pay the wages and other bills ? Other than cutting costs.

Or does it reset at 31 dec ?
 
Nixon doesn't exactly say it's off just, "Not yet"and "Agreeing a fee with Oxford".

Let's hope there is still quite a big margin difference in our valuations then and it's not. Just Ironing out the final details.

Would be nice for this to be over one way or another.

If he is going to go may aswell be in the next couple days and not a last minute bigger bid on deadline day when we think we have gotten away with it would be way worse.

que sera sera

Bring on the season.
 
Yep, they've referenced Whiteman's departure, so they're suggesting it would need to be a similar case with Mills refusing to play to force a move. As it stands, the only people who've spoken on this move have been Preston ITK and Nixon, who've both said very different things. Can't say he's completed a medical and announcement imminent if the clubs haven't even agreed a fee...
Someone is going to have a serious injury tripping over all these downed tools at the training ground
 
This guy has been very vocal as ITK on the Mills rumours. Was saying earlier it was a done deal, etc and an announcement would be imminent. And now it's a case of Mills would have to force a move. Funny how it's gone from him having completed a medical yesterday, to not having agreed a fee with us yet. Time will tell, but it seems to be unravelling a bit
View attachment 36855
It’s probably Nixon’s son 😂
 
Nixon doesn't exactly say it's off just, "Not yet"and "Agreeing a fee with Oxford".

Let's hope there is still quite a big margin difference in our valuations then and it's not. Just Ironing out the final details.

Would be nice for this to be over one way or another.

If he is going to go may aswell be in the next couple days and not a last minute bigger bid on deadline day when we think we have gotten away with it would be way worse.

que sera sera

Bring on the season.

I’d prefer to get as many games out of Mills as possible.
 
Nixon doesn't exactly say it's off just, "Not yet"and "Agreeing a fee with Oxford".

Let's hope there is still quite a big margin difference in our valuations then and it's not. Just Ironing out the final details.

Would be nice for this to be over one way or another.

If he is going to go may aswell be in the next couple days and not a last minute bigger bid on deadline day when we think we have gotten away with it would be way worse.

que sera sera

Bring on the season.
Well a bigger late bid would be better financially
 
So has someone summarised old and new rules
OLD RULES CHAMPIONSHIP LAST SEASON
Could overspend £105M over rolling three years
NEW RULES 85% of revenue ? And budgets rules ?

EFL1.
New rules 65% of revenue / invested money for a relegated club. Plus proof of financing for the season ahead by 30 June ?

Is this about right ?

So a bit of saving Stan Mills wage bill won’t solve the transfer embargo.
Incorrect - From the 2026–27 season onward, the Championship uses Squad Cost Rules (SCR), capping spending on player and manager costs at 85% of football income, backed by a flexible owner equity top-up allowance of £33 million over a rolling three-year period (max £15 million per season). This replaces the old Profitability and Sustainability (P&S) limits of £39 million in losses over three years. Your £105m is completely wrong.Budget rules I sent to you on the 27th July, do you need a further copy?
 
Last edited:
Be really funny if another team hijacked this move
 
Back
Top Bottom