• Further New Features Are Available - Click To Update
  • Join OxVox

    The forum would encourage all members to consider joining OxVox during this important moment in our history. See here for more information.

Transfer Window 26/27 Summer Embargo Window



 
Last edited by a moderator:
Roosken and BdK are best mates aren't they?

If the release increases towards the end of the window, BdK having a run around in League One for a few weeks before going would appear to work in our favour.

Not sure how it plays out, but I imagine the club expect BdK to go if/when his clause is met (most probably the same with Helik) whilst retaining Spencer/Mills/Currie etc
Don’t think Helik goes tbh.
 
Sorry what sort of excuse is that ( looking after a friends family ) what a load of sh*t. A footballer wants to play football . Who hell buys into this, wake up !
Last friendly he doesn’t play, drops out when we are in a relegation battle. Come on.
Really good player but but but
 
Robust footballers.

If we were fortunate enough to find ourselves in a position where we somehow allowed to supplement the squad we'd need to make sure those additions were (as far as is practicably possible) those who could handle the rigours of a full League One season.

No punts. As simple as that.
All of our foreign signings have proved fragile, haven’t they? I guess Krastev wasn’t here long enough to do his leg in.
 
Sorry what sort of excuse is that ( looking after a friends family ) what a load of sh*t. A footballer wants to play football . Who hell buys into this, wake up !
Last friendly he doesn’t play, drops out when we are in a relegation battle. Come on.
Really good player but but but
Not really an excuse is it.

Bringing Roosken’s family into it would be out of order if it wasn’t true don’t you think?
 
Interesting call for Long to play over Helik. I know it’s pre season but to me that team was his best team. Long was the pick of the bunch in the back line. Dominant in the air and controlled the back line. Pushed into midfield a lot and started attacks.
Possibly Long gets the nod over Helik because he is slicker with the ball in possession.
 
It’s called being a dedicated and loyal footballer earning a bloody good wage.
My boss would laugh me out the office!
And if Ramsey gave him the ok to do it?

Is he supposed to say:

‘’nah, second thoughts boss, I won’t bother helping out Ruben & his family actually’’

You don’t know the circumstances, but if it was acceptable for Ramsey and he okay’d it then it’s good enough for me.

If BDK leaves in the next week he leaves, but if what Ramsey says is true then I see no issue with it, if Roosken has got no family members in the country then having someone there who knows his extended family is more than acceptable.

Good enough for Ramsey, good enough for me.
 
  • React
Reactions: Ian
And if Ramsey gave him the ok to do it?

Is he supposed to say:

‘’nah, second thoughts boss, I won’t bother helping out Ruben & his family actually’’

You don’t know the circumstances, but if it was acceptable for Ramsey and he okay’d it then it’s good enough for me.

If BDK leaves in the next week he leaves, but if what Ramsey says is true then I see no issue with it, if Roosken has got no family members in the country then having someone there who knows his extended family is more than acceptable.

Good enough for Ramsey, good enough for me.
If he had a late night and missed training it might be a factor in not making the bench, but I’m sure it’s not the main reason he’s not playing. So not a lie but probably an exaggeration.
 
If he had a late night and missed training it might be a factor in not making the bench, but I’m sure it’s not the main reason he’s not playing. So not a lie but probably an exaggeration.
Without any further confirmation then we have to take what Ramsey says at face value, don’t know what he would get from bringing Roosken’s family into a situation in regards to BDK refusing to play because he wants out, I don’t think that would go down too well.
 
Heard a rumour we could sign loan players without paying them a salary. Loan club keen just to get them some footy league experience.
 
I think Ramsey is trying to protect all sides at the moment because if no bids come in that meet the release fee then he’s going to want to keep the door open for BDK. Fact is he needed to change the reason because illness was the reason for the 3 previous absences.
My forum bingo card is filling up. “Downed tools” and “Fact” in the space of a couple of posts. If we get a “HCDAJFU” I’ll be shouting “line”.
 
But we cant register them

We can if we drop below 23 players, but those loan players have to be completely free, no wage contributions and no loan fee. So it’s going to be players that are not getting interest from other clubs. We can sign out of contract players as well if we drop below 23 players but only for the season, so again it’s going to be players who no one else wants.

While we are in the embargo the signings we can make, if we go below the 23 squad size rule, are going to be pretty limited, you might get lucky but the odds are against you with the rules.
 
Although the reason given by Ramsey is a strange one why would he lie about it when the easy get out is just to say he picked up a knock in training tight groin/hamstring so not risking him

Maybe it was a slight dig at BDK from Ramsey.
 
What by bringing Roosken’s family into it?

Seems a sure fire way to p**s off Roosken if he did that if you ask me.
My interpretation of it is something that could well be true but the impact exaggerated to save churning out the same story every time he misses a game.

Ramsey has had opportunities to lie about lots of things and either he hasn’t or he’s mastered it. It had the feeling of running out of excuses, but here’s a new one at least.

We’ve all been following the game long enough. When a player misses this many successive games for flimsy reasons it’s rarely just bad luck. It’s also rare that they re-surface a fully energised player for that club.

I suspect BDK is disappointed and got himself in a bit of a tizz now - the season is approaching. I don’t buy any of this puff that he’s happy here because that would suggest he feels he’s in a no-lose situation. In which case, why not at least get yourself match fit?
 
My interpretation of it is something that could well be true but the impact exaggerated to save churning out the same story every time he misses a game.

Ramsey has had opportunities to lie about lots of things and either he hasn’t or he’s mastered it. It had the feeling of running out of excuses, but here’s a new one at least.

We’ve all been following the game long enough. When a player misses this many successive games for flimsy reasons it’s rarely just bad luck. It’s also rare that they re-surface a fully energised player for that club.

I suspect BDK is disappointed. I don’t buy any of this puff that he’s happy here because that would suggest he feels he’s in a no-lose situation. In which case, why not at least get yourself match fit?
What your saying could be true, but why would Ramsey risk alienating another player, one who’s just got seriously injured to make up an excuse & bring his family into it?

I don’t see that going down too well.

He might be disappointed but he agreed to the contract when he signed it with the clauses as they are.

I personally think it was a genuine reason, BDK might go but it’s clear he won’t be going for pennies.
 
Heard a rumour we could sign loan players without paying them a salary. Loan club keen just to get them some footy league experience.

We can't register anyone unless someone leaves permanently or we terminate their contract.

But if they did, then we can bring a replacement in on a half season loan, and in theory pay absolutely nothing towards their wages if the other club agreed to pay 100%. Pretty unlikely though.
 
What your saying could be true, but why would Ramsey risk alienating another player, one who’s just got seriously injured to make up an excuse & bring his family into it?

I don’t see that going down too well.

He might be disappointed but he agreed to the contract when he signed it with the clauses as they are.

I personally think it was a genuine reason, BDK might go but it’s clear he won’t be going for pennies.
I don’t think Ramsey is alienating anyone - he consistently says we need everybody, so I suspect he’d quite like to have the best footballer at the club getting ready to go.

I’ve seen this line a few times, “bringing family in to it” - he hasn’t exactly over-shared and invaded anyone’s privacy so let’s not overplay that.

I agree with the contract aspect, although his argument might be that he signed it under false pretences. After he joined the wheels came off and it went from bad to worse. I understand the club position - if he gets what I presume he wants (I.e. sold for less than his clause) then how many other players will expect moves?

I see both sides, my main point is that I haven’t seen or heard anything that convinces me of the claims that BDK wants to be here.
 
I don’t think Ramsey is alienating anyone - he consistently says we need everybody, so I suspect he’d quite like to have the best footballer at the club getting ready to go.

I’ve seen this line a few times, “bringing family in to it” - he hasn’t exactly over-shared and invaded anyone’s privacy so let’s not overplay that.

I agree with the contract aspect, although his argument might be that he signed it under false pretences. After he joined the wheels came off and it went from bad to worse. I understand the club position - if he gets what I presume he wants (I.e. sold for less than his clause) then how many other players will expect moves?

I see both sides, my main point is that I haven’t seen or heard anything that convinces me of the claims that BDK wants to be here.
Well I’ve seen him still training in numerous videos so from that point of view he’s still around the squad and training.

If he was refusing to train or had a bad attitude I’m not sure he’d be training with the rest of the group.

I mean bringing Roosken’s family into it would be uneccessary as he could just say something else that doesn’t involve another player and his family.

Time will tell, at least if he does go we are at least getting top dollar.
 
I’ve seen this line a few times, “bringing family in to it” - he hasn’t exactly over-shared and invaded anyone’s privacy so let’s not overplay that.
I dunno, if a teammate was outright refusing to play because he wanted a move, and the manager blamed him not playing on helping me and my family out, when he wasn’t, I’d find it at the very, very least odd and probably strange and annoying
 
Back
Top Bottom