- Season Ticket
- Yes
- Year of First Game
- 1998
All players, and how do you know?Yes I do.
Rowett a disaster for keeping us up is an interesting take, I must say.As much as we all love our club and, put on the yellow tinted glasses week in, week out, it has to accepted that so long as we have no budget to mention, we stand little chance of attracting the talent needed to play at Championship level. We won't attract the players or the coaching staff. We got incredibly lucky making the play-offs and then winning but, once in the Championship, can we really say that we advanced, both in playing talent and, management?
Rowett was a disaster, barely kept us up last season and hadn't got a clue as to how to run a campaign to, at least, make mid-table. Bloomfield does not have the experience and nous to do any better. Until the club has an income on a par with other clubs making up the Championship, we just cannot hope to achieve unless incredibly lucky.
I'm not resigned to relegation but, let's face it, it is looking likely. It's a bloody shame because this league has provided far more than just football.
I’m not going to say how I know but yes the players are behind Bloomfield and the staff.All players, and how do you know?
Not saying players have downed tools, but I’m not sure all the players back him or are classified as Team Bloomfield.
I think your’ll find it’s the same players both manager had - Maybe just maybe they ain’t good enough, just a thought…………Of course Bloomfield isn't anywhere near as negative, defeatist or downright doff-capping as Gary Rowett.
But, devil's advocate, this is a guy who has had three months in charge and still thinks MPH can take a long throw and that Will Vaulks is worth chucking on in games for any reason (there is no reason).
The two really aren't a million miles apart in their approach. The incumbent just smiles more.
Two years ago Danny Röhl took over at Wednesday when they hadn't won a game all season.
He won 43% of their remaining games and stayed up. With Will Vaulks as Player Of The Season and Ugbo (who hasn't scored since) as their top scorer.
Don't tell me that winning more than 28% of your games is unrealistic.
s**t example every manager does that whether they are playing against 10 or 11 Leeds brought everyone back the other night against man uFor example, when Pompey went down to 10 men we should have left one of our players up the pitch to make Pompey bring at least 2 players back, plus the other who’s taking their throw/corner, but we had all 11 back defending meaning Pompey could push more players on, hence them getting the equaliser. And 2 or 3 of their players were absolutely free.
I believed this was caused because players believe that as we’re all back defending that all will be okay, but I think that breeds complacency e.g. they don’t keep their focus.
I think this is a good point. However, if both Rowett and Bloomfield set up the team in the same way, then maybe it's because they realise the players aren't good enough and that it's probably the best way to get a result. Just a thought...I think that Bloomfield generally sets us up to try not to concede rather than take the game to the opposition, hence why I said yesterday I hope we go at Derby etc.
He just wants us to try and stay in the game and get a goal from a set piece e.g. throw in, corner, free kick etc as we rarely create anything of note or don’t try this.
The thing is, if we concede we then struggle to create openings. The two chances we got today was mainly down to shutting their players down rather than passing and moving through the thirds.
I don’t have faith in Bloomfield, seems like Rowett v2 as I said previously.
Will Vaulks has recently been good coming on, he enables us to change shape and we've looked more settled and dangerous. Should have been on earlier at Derby.Of course Bloomfield isn't anywhere near as negative, defeatist or downright doff-capping as Gary Rowett.
But, devil's advocate, this is a guy who has had three months in charge and still thinks MPH can take a long throw and that Will Vaulks is worth chucking on in games for any reason (there is no reason).
The two really aren't a million miles apart in their approach. The incumbent just smiles more.
West brom havent lost a game since we played them at the end of February, at the time they looked one of the worst teams in the league and heading for relegation.We have been a bit unlucky in that several teams around us have perked up.
That West Brom result has killed us really.
The only hope is points penalty for West Brom.
They have Watford and Sheff Wednesday to play so unless the deduction is 10 points theyd probably still be above us by the end of the season.Wrexham have a good chance of playoffs but they have realistically no chance of autos - still means they will be gunning for us and far more of a threat than a limp Watford were last week
Realistically L1 time unless Baggies get a big deduction
I think your’ll find it’s the same players both manager had - Maybe just maybe they ain’t good enough, just a thought…………
Exactly this. Bloomfield brought more positive personal vibes and with a couple of better players but the underlying limitations remain. It's to his credit that we're still technically in the hunt. Every time he's tried to be more expansive we've looked chronically vulnerable to a battering.I think this is a good point. However, if both Rowett and Bloomfield set up the team in the same way, then maybe it's because they realise the players aren't good enough and that it's probably the best way to get a result. Just a thought...
Konak has been our best player. Harris for Donley is bonkers.Need a freshen up on Tuesday. Emakhu, Harris and McDonnell all to start. Drop MPH, Donley and Konak.
Konak has been our best player for over a month in my view.Konak has been our best player. Harris for Donley is bonkers.
When we beat West Brom the opposite was said.West Brom playing like a team with fight.
Chalk and cheese to what we offered earlier.
Ffs
When we beat West Brom the opposite was said.
So much changing of minds and history here.
I just think we aren't good enough, i think they give it there all. The midfield of virtually all the championship teams is better than our week in week out .Our defence is mid table our midfield and attackers are where we areAll players, and how do you know?
Not saying players have downed tools, but I’m not sure all the players back him or are classified as Team Bloomfield.
Totally. It was astonishing to hear them singing how bad we were.Had words with some young lads in front of me who joined in that too.
Absolute cretins.
Konak has been our best player for over a month in my view.
Agree, leaving him out wouod ge madness.
A real shame that none of the amazing players bought in in Jan have really excelled then.That’s not quite true.
Rowett had Matt Phillips, Luke Harris, Krastev, Dembele, Sibley, Leigh.
Bloomfield was heavily backed in January with serious money paid for permanent /loans for the likes of Emakhu, Jin-Woo, McDonell, Makosso, Donley, MPH.
The current squad in my view is also stronger than the one Rowett kept us up with last season.
Will Vaulks has recently been good coming on, he enables us to change shape and we've looked more settled and dangerous. Should have been on earlier at Derby.
Can't you see that?
Konak has excelled as well. All three are starters. Almost 30% of our starting 11. Makosso has done well when played. I’d say the jury is still out on Roosken etc.A real shame that none of the amazing players bought in in Jan have really excelled then.
Donely ,MPH the only starters and while some good games none of them have been the difference between staying up or going down ....so far anyway
A real shame that none of the amazing players bought in in Jan have really excelled then.
Donely ,MPH the only starters and while some good games none of them have been the difference between staying up or going down ....so far anyway
Konak has excelled as well. All three are starters. Almost 30% of our starting 11. Makosso has done well when played. I’d say the jury is still out on Roosken etc.