"Irrational expectation" is my middle name.It's natural to see what is happening all around us, but it's more about the irrational expectation that several sides at the bottom will suddenly hit promotion form whilst also thinking that we'll fall off a cliff.
If we look at our pre-Rowett form, we got 18 points from 21 games. Even a repeat of that form would see us hit 49.86 points for the season. For the bottom 4 or 5 clubs to get to 50 points they would have to mirror the form of clubs like West Brom and Middlesbrough have so far.
Anything can happen, and our own form has shown how quickly things can change. But we would need to see three clubs hit playoff form over a third of the season AND for us to simultaneously hit self destruct.
No complacency, but plenty of reasons to be hopeful that we will do more than just survive.
And pretty foolish for anyone to to publicly state that anyone else thinks it's job done, I'd say.It would be very foolish for anyone to publicly state it's job done.
Spot on. In fact so spot on I'm having it tattooed on my children.It does make me chuckle whenever we lose a game, the doom and gloom that comes with it. It’s like some people actually expect us to win 46/46 and every single loss is deemed as not good enough etc…
Realistically every away game is a challenge in this division from top to bottom, some obviously more so than others. Every home game gives us a better chance but is equally going to be a tough game and we still have to work extremely hard for the 3 points.
As long as the players have given 100% that’s as much as we can ask. Sometimes our performances in terms of quality are going to significantly dip and other times they’ll be exceeded. We have to accept as well that some teams have playing resources way above ours at present, if we can stay in this division then over a period of time we can start to climb up some of those higher levels, but for now we have to realise that we’re going to lose far more than we win. Of course it’s disappointing when we are defeated whoever the opposition is, no one sets out or wants to lose, but the expectation of some is crazy.
Yet again players who have a bad game are written off. Until the next time when if we win they should be getting new contracts etc… Of course it’s what a forum is all about and there are always different opinions.
I think most of us are relying on our defenders to score because, aside from a rare beauty from CB or WV, the goals aren’t coming from any other sources.So who is relying on defenders to score or being complacent in feeling home and dry?
Sadly even when he plays well he doesn't tend to get acclaimed as 'one of our own' - not sure why that is.Sam long has generally been good this season and has stepped up well to the demands of the championship.
So, when he has a poor game against Burnley away no less, why is it all guns blazing against him saying ‘he needs to be sold, not good enough etc’.
The same posters will then be calling him ‘one of our own’ during his next good performance.
Tend to agree. There seem to have been some outlandish negative comments recently in my view.And pretty foolish for anyone to to publicly state that anyone else thinks it's job done, I'd say.
Sadly even when he plays well he doesn't tend to get acclaimed as 'one of our own' - not sure why that is.
Tend to agree.
Tend to agree. There seem to have been some outlandish negative comments recently in my view.
There have been some pretty good analysis on why 45/ 46 points will probably be enough.
From.the position we are in and recent form, the bookies are probably right- in 6 times out of 7 we should stay up
Now it is possible that we fall apart and can't win 2 to 3 games in 15.
The suggestion that the club are being complacent, seems pretty unsubstantiated and out of order I reckon
I’m not sure they are being complacent as such, I just think that by choosing not to fix such a blatant and obvious issue, they have accepted it’s going to be tougher than it needed to be.Tend to agree.
Tend to agree. There seem to have been some outlandish negative comments recently in my view.
There have been some pretty good analysis on why 45/ 46 points will probably be enough.
From.the position we are in and recent form, the bookies are probably right- in 6 times out of 7 we should stay up
Now it is possible that we fall apart and can't win 2 to 3 games in 15.
The suggestion that the club are being complacent, seems pretty unsubstantiated and out of order I reckon
Yes, we even passed back in time added on when we should have pushed the CB's up and targeted them.Burnley really are pretty dull to watch, aren’t they? Aside from that 15/20 minute spell in the first half, they didn’t really overwhelm us at all.
I thought we lacked a real desire to be brave and get something from the game. This was highlighted by the desire to pass back to Cumming repeatedly with less than 5 minutes to go.
Matos was outstanding. I’d be talking to Chelsea now, to see if we could have him for a whole year in 25/26. I’ve been a defender of Vaulks, when many have been piling on. However, Matos showed second half what it is to have genuine athleticism in the deep lying role. He covered so much ground and was combative. I liked him further forward, too.
Cumming was very good again. I’d be amazed if he doesn’t have admirers further up the food chain.
For the first time since he arrived, I thought Rowett got it wrong with the Sam Long selection. Having not played for a couple of weeks, it was always going to be difficult for him to come in and be sufficiently effective to nullify Burnley’s attacking threats. Unfortunately, he got the run around rather a lot, especially first half.
Can the fan fare over Goodrham calm down a touch? It’s probably unpopular but I cannot recall the last ‘outstanding’ game he had in this league. You know, the kind of game that screams £10,000,000 player. He is a prospect and has a high ceiling, but I think he’s a fair way off being a star at this level. Last night the game passed him by and it wasn’t for the first (or second) time.
Dembele was disappointing. Too many touches and he seems to slow us down. End product was an issue according to Birmingham fans, wasn’t it? I’d not disagree at this moment in time.
For Bradshaw see Harris #2. Oh to have a 2025 version of Ryan Taylor…or a transfer window to sign an alternative type striker to what we have.
Next week is big. Very BIG!
Unless million pound man Romeny is meant to be the fix. Otherwise I tend to agree.I’m not sure they are being complacent as such, I just think that by choosing not to fix such a blatant and obvious issue, they have accepted it’s going to be tougher than it needed to be.
But it's not that black and white is it? I'm not sure they haven't 'chosen' to address the 'obvious' issue - I'm sure Rowett and team are in no doubt where we have a lack of quality but finding the man to plug that hole is not an easy or cheap process, or alternatively a complete gamble. There are only a couple of teams in the division with a 15/20 goal striker and yet everybody wants one, so the premium is higher.I’m not sure they are being complacent as such, I just think that by choosing not to fix such a blatant and obvious issue, they have accepted it’s going to be tougher than it needed to be.
Tend to agree.
Tend to agree. There seem to have been some outlandish negative comments recently in my view.
There have been some pretty good analysis on why 45/ 46 points will probably be enough.
From.the position we are in and recent form, the bookies are probably right- in 6 times out of 7 we should stay up
Now it is possible that we fall apart and can't win 2 to 3 games in 15.
The suggestion that the club are being complacent, seems pretty unsubstantiated and out of order I reckon
It's not always a 20 goal scoring striker it's someone who can win a battle and hold up the ball and bring others into play. maybe look like scoring or score from a header, let's hope we get over the line .The next two games we know are massive two draws will help or a win and a draw ,but dint lose both or all of a sudden not having a really decent striker could bite us where it hurts .But it's not that black and white is it? I'm not sure they haven't 'chosen' to address the 'obvious' issue - I'm sure Rowett and team are in no doubt where we have a lack of quality but finding the man to plug that hole is not an easy or cheap process, or alternatively a complete gamble. There are only a couple of teams in the division with a 15/20 goal striker and yet everybody wants one, so the premium is higher.
Do we gamble on a striker from League One or Two and hope they can step up? For instance, Langstaff scored a bunch of goals for Notts County and had his advocates here but is seemingly completely out of depth in the Championship. It will be interesting to see if Al-Hamadi can get on the scoresheet regularly, a handful of goals for a dominant Ipswich is no real indication. On the other hand, Luton reportedly offered £4m for a striker with exactly 6 months of league experience.
I realise I should ignore your 'told you so' trolling, particularly given your comments regarding other teams in recent years but it really is tiresome.
I have done the exact same thing Scotchers, I know where to expect the points to come from, and where to expect them to not come from.Right from the offset this season, I would have split this league into three. The bottom 8 or so that we should be looking to beat (and we are). The middle 10 or so that we should be looking to match, and under Rowett we're doing just that. And then the top few who you just look to be competitive against.
I don't disagree that we are not getting enough goals from our strikers. But we're also struggling to create enough, and we do need to look at strengthening across the front of the team.I have done the exact same thing Scotchers, I know where to expect the points to come from, and where to expect them to not come from.
However, regardless of who we're playing, whether they're top, middle or bottom of the table, our strikers aren't scoring, they don't score, and that's a problem. That's not negativity, it's a fact.
Hard work is all well and good, pressing is all well and good, holding the ball up is all well and good. But we need our strikers to start contributing goals, because if our defenders stop scoring so regularly, which they very likely will, where do the equivalent amount of goals come from?
We're all very happy with the way things are currently going, but it is an obvious issue, and it's not being negative to simply express concern about it.
You wont find many better servants of a club anywhere else. Maybe a Sam Long statue in town.I’ve heard that reference a few times but maybe not as much as he deserves.
The disrespect to say ‘he has to go’ after a bad game when he’s been an incredible servant to the club is nothing short of moronic.
I agree, it's not just the strikers who are falling short, it's all of our attacking players. No composure, poor decision making, and a worrying lack of quality.I don't disagree that we are not getting enough goals from our strikers. But we're also struggling to create enough, and we do need to look at strengthening across the front of the team.
I think that he is trying to replace like with like, but Stan Mills will of course make that a lot easier.
I'd have considered bringing back Goodwin if we really weren't in the market to bring an additional front man in.
Sam didn’t look 100% fit last night and was treading water before halftime. Burnley craftily exploited the gap between him and the flying Pole and we were all at sea down the right flank. Matters picked up after the break though.
Burnley have great players all over the pitch and are tactically shrewd. But there’s still something meh about them, maybe it’s a lack of ruthless streak. I could see them cocking up infhe playoffs.