Search results

Most internet trolls prefer to say things anonymously, so it's not a surprise, he'll probably wait until the closing minutes of the deadline to do his

Responses so far..... For: 726 with 113 from OX5 and 243 total from CDC Against: 95 with 68 from OX5 and 3 extra from the Cherwell district

Responses so far..... For: 710 with 110 from OX5 and 239 total from the Cherwell district Against: 71 with 51 from OX5 and 2 additional from the Cherwell district

I got a little behind, I'll try and catch up in the week

I know of people that don't want the stadium but have mentioned renting out their drive if it happens😂

I've always wondered that about Middleton, he could've actually remained Neutral atleast publicly and still drip fed FoSB the information they wanted. But through the whole process he has wanted to be the visible Councillor standing against the "developer". I can only assume he's taken this...

Ah so building on a small triangle of scrubland is now akin to Rainforest destruction in South America

The idea of a deep tyre track becoming a micro wetland habitat is laughable, not least because I assume if the tracks are deep it's because a vehicle regularly drives through the "wetland habitat".

So Middleton isn't standing in the election?

I wonder how many for and against are put off that your name and address is public

Responses so far..... For: 407 with 67 from OX5 and 153 total from CDC. Against: 46 with 35 from OX5 and 2 more from the CDC area Not really sure I should count all of the company directors comments so I've left one off.

Their comment on the portal has every fi replaced with ● Eg. Strat●eld Brake

Could anyone explain why FoSB replaced fi with a ●

Yep, it's always best not to cut and paste directly from FoSB articles. FoSB putting in one or two extra words could change things entirely. Can we see the conditions set out by OCC but without taking it from those lot

Responses so far after a complete recount.... Support: 364 with 62 in the OX5 area, 142 total in CDC Against: 40 with 31 in the OX5 area

I remember it being mentioned as a possibility but nothing promised by TW

Was there a promise of a bridge at the Triangle or was that at SB

Absolutely not, if you thought rowdiness on a footbridge was bad you'd shudder at the thought of Hooligans bursting out of the water on Jetski's like a scene out of waterworld

My tally sheets are at home, I'll do it tonight and hopefully a few more are added later

I'd hazard a guess and say its fairly significant, Nimbys tend to be from the demographic that are the most likely to go out and vote, in my opinion.