Oxford1996
Well-known member
- Joined
- 29 Jul 2019
- Messages
- 2,546
Think Garbutt would be a shrewd addition to that squad. Was very good for us and Ipswich left wing & also provides cover if Ruffels ever got injured.
Anyone have an update on ins and outs, from Karl’s interview on ifollow? Cheers
I would much prefer Nathan Holland over Luke Garbutt. If we sell Dickie for 3mil, I would like to think that we can afford Holland. Grigg? Meh, not that into him.
I’d take Garbutt as he can cover left side both as a winger and full back but would prefer pace. Holland? However there may have to be Dickie + 1 out i think.
Are we not able to bypass the wage cap by offering a signing on fee and performance related bonuses, in order to cover the drop in salary?I doubt we could afford Holland's wages especially with a salary cap. I suspect, based on nothing, that one at least, will be a loan.
Nope, they're included.Are we not able to bypass the wage cap by offering a signing on fee and performance related bonuses, in order to cover the drop in salary?
Shite bags.Nope, they're included.
Nope, they're included.
I would much prefer Nathan Holland over Luke Garbutt. If we sell Dickie for 3mil, I would like to think that we can afford Holland. Grigg? Meh, not that into him.
Dickie going with Garbutt & Grigg coming in would be a great window