This argument is a stupid one, even if it did have full employment that doesn't mean it always will and its completely ignoring the planned population increase after the housing development or that more local employment means employment in other areas becomes available.
It's a silly argument
I had to laugh last night when I came across an objection from my mother inlaw, as it had clearly been done by her husband and he had even wrote about voting Conservative in the comment.....she's a devout Labour supporter.
Obviously I screen grabbed it and shared it on the family wattsapp...
Responses so far, not sure how accurate they are at this point, some are duplicated and pretty sure I now need glasses after scrolling through each one on my phone everything got a bit blurry to say the least.
For: 1474 with 166 from OX5 and 435 total from CDC
Against: 501 with 329 from OX5...
Exactly, let's not over react to our numbers, how often does a planning application get this many comments of support? Never.
The numbers are very telling for FoSB though, they simply don't have the numbers they claim
Responses so far.....
For: 710 with 110 from OX5 and 239 total from the Cherwell district
Against: 71 with 51 from OX5 and 2 additional from the Cherwell district