When Tiger says, "before people panic, the accounts for the year will actually show a profit," is it worth taking that with a pinch of salt? As in, is that profit likely to have been made because of capital injection from the board, rather than purely organic? I know he references things like iFollow, the PL grant and obviously player sales, but surely after the year we (and football more widely) have had, there's no way we can actually be in the black? We weren't exactly raking in massive profits before the pandemic - it seems difficult to believe that we've actually made money when such a major revenue stream has been cut off.
Or is the language he's using a little bit clever, in that 'the accounts for the year' refers to the last financial year? I note Companies House states that our next accounts, 'made up to 30 June 2020', are 'due by 30 June 2021'. Realistically most of the losses suffered by clubs will have been incurred in the current 2020/21 season - which these accounts won't show. Really, all they'll show is the loss of about 7 home games' worth of guaranteed income, so, given the sale of Fosu and Baptiste, it's more likely that they'll be showing a profit. Will the accounts for next year (i.e. the current year) make for grimmer reading than he's letting on?
Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to punch holes in what is a very good statement, and I appreciate (as I'm sure we all do) the transparency. I am just wary of getting lulled into a false sense of security.
Or is the language he's using a little bit clever, in that 'the accounts for the year' refers to the last financial year? I note Companies House states that our next accounts, 'made up to 30 June 2020', are 'due by 30 June 2021'. Realistically most of the losses suffered by clubs will have been incurred in the current 2020/21 season - which these accounts won't show. Really, all they'll show is the loss of about 7 home games' worth of guaranteed income, so, given the sale of Fosu and Baptiste, it's more likely that they'll be showing a profit. Will the accounts for next year (i.e. the current year) make for grimmer reading than he's letting on?
Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to punch holes in what is a very good statement, and I appreciate (as I'm sure we all do) the transparency. I am just wary of getting lulled into a false sense of security.