National News Govt lose in Court again

"Reports from Raqqa suggest she was a religious "enforcer" when ISIL were in charge." - how would the apparently "medieval' religion deal with a woman being an enforcer - sounds unlikely....

Really?
"There were lots of young European women in the hisbah. Some of them were very harsh and the local population became very scared."

And if you are unaware of who the hisbah are: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26297465?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
 
If she were to have been shot and killed in a war she chose to attend it would be straightforward to say that her actions have had consequences. If she were tried and convicted it would be straightforward to say that her actions have had consequences. To remove citizenship in these circumstances is just passive-aggressive bullshit. Playing silly buggers with nationality laws is ridiculous.

Out of interest, how far does freedom of speech go? Sure if she’s inciting or facilitating violence or terrorism that’s prosecutable, but I hope you aren’t suggesting that people should be forbidden from being citizens because they despise the way a country runs, or because they follow a particular religion? That approach has failed spectacularly in the past,

She chose to flee this country for her ideological reasons.
One of the consequences of that is that she legally lost for British citizenship.
The court case was about her being able to return to challenge that removal.
Sadly she is a risk to national security, supported by information not in the public domain, so can`t return in person.
Maybe sometime in the future they`ll be able to set up a Zoom or Teams meeting............. until then................ :)
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom